(1) Whether it is policy to regard transformation more important than capacity and qualification in cases where there are no previously disadvantaged applicants who are qualified to fill a vacancy; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, how many (a) qualified public servants in each department have been turned down because they are regarded as previously advantaged and (b) vacancies are there in each department because an appointment was not made for the above reason during the period 1 April 1995 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; (2) whether it is policy to appoint unqualified applicants for a position in cases where there are no previously disadvantaged applicants who are qualified to fill a vacancy; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether a position is left vacant in cases where there are no previously disadvantaged applicants who are qualified to fill a vacancy; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?