Through you, Mr Speaker, I would like the hon Minister to be kind enough to comment on a report that I have on my desk, which indicates that the function of the design of the complex would enable the President or somebody else to survive a prolonged siege should he be unwilling to surrender himself to somebody wanting to get in there. If that is the design, from a trait point of view, at least in the report I received, it does not seem that it is designed specifically to resist terrorist attack, but it seems to be designed for the purpose of maintaining the long-term sustainability of those living there under conditions of siege. Is that the intent? That is the first thing that I would like you to comment on.
Secondly, we are all very puzzled about this constant resorting to classifying it as secret. We understand that under the existing secrecy laws that is unconstitutional in effect. Be that as it may, while secrecy is an option for government, why not waive the secrecy because it is a matter of public interest? [Time expired.]