Table 2.Key estimates of performance 2012/13 |PERFORMANCE INDICATORS |TARGET ESTIMATED ACHIEVED 2012/13| |Delivery agreements delivered and|Delivery agreements were revised | | |and reviewed | |revised | | |Monitoring report on the |Four quarterly monitoring reports| |functioning of all implementation|per outcome has been submitted to| |Forums |Cabinet | |Research on outcomes monitoring |One report has been achieved for | | |the | | |research outcome monitoring and | | |the | | |draft tool for municipal | | |performance assessment process | | |has been developed | |The number of government staff |About 200 government staff | |trained on evaluations |trained | |Number of evaluation reports |8 evaluations were started and1 | |approved by evaluation steering |final report was approved by the | |committee in which |evaluation steering committee. | |DPME is a member | | |Number of quarterly reports for |About 4 quarterly progress report| |all outcomes displayed to public |on core indicators reflected to | |on POA |the public | |Number of data forum meeting and |Quarterly data forums for about | |quarterly reports |10 outcomes had been held | |Number of departments supported |The first MPAT assessment report | |to improve their M&E MPAT scores |was concluded and submitted to | | |Cabinet MPAT tool was updated and| | |approved by August 2012 | |Annual Development Indicators |Develop and publish development | |document |indicators by March 2014 | |Percentage of national and |43% (18/42) national departments | |provincial |and70% (79/113) provincial | |departments whose HODs has signed|departments had | | |their DG's signed off the MPAT | |off the MPAT assessment |score by | | |end of the third quarter | |Number of monitoring reports on |10 monitoring reports were | |approved key indicators compiled |submitted to FOSAD | |and submitted to FOSAD | | |FSD programme implementation |Tools and guidelines reviewed and| |tools and guidelines reviewed and|published on FSDM web-based | |finalised and presented to |portal by end June 2012 | |provincial M&E Forum meeting for| | |use in the implementation of the | | |programme | | |Front line service delivery |100 sites visited with site | |monitoring |monitoring | |visits |reports captured on web-based | | |portal | | |for the programme | |Percentage of service delivery |50% of service delivery site have| |sites |been | |Which have been visited at least |visited twice. | |twice, | | |at which there has been an | | |improvement in scores for at | | |least two of the eight | | |assessment areas | | |Citizen-Based monitoring |Policy framework for citizen | |programme |based monitoring programme | | |submitted to Cabinet by March | | |2013 | |National average case resolution |80% of cases were resolved by end| |rate at national and provincial |of | |level |March 2013 |