4. While respecting the independence of the SAHRC, the Committee, however, believes that given limited resources, the SAHRC may need to be selective about what it investigates. In particular, the Committee is concerned that the decision to become involved where there are also impending judicial proceedings, specifically the SAHRC's report on the killing of Andries Tatane, may well be duplication. Further, the Committee cautions against making findings when there are judicial processes involved, and questions the usefulness of findings that are based on a desktop study. The Committee raised its concerns regarding the report when it met with the SAHRC, which provided the Committee with an explanation as to why it belied the investigation to be important. The discussion that followed raises, in the Committee's opinion, many important issues. The Committee anticipates that there will be greater opportunity to explore such questions with the Commission's input when it considers the South African Human Rights Commission Bill [B5 - 2013].