(1)What assurances can she give that she has strictly adhered to the principle of non interference throughout her tenure;
(2) whether she would be open to testifying under oath to confirm that there is no evidence, even prima facie, suggesting that she interfered in the day-to-day operations of the State Security Agency (SSA); if not, what is the position in this regard; if, so, what are the relevant details;
(3) what measures has she put in place to (a) guarantee the autonomy of the SSA and (b) uphold public trust and confidence in the operations of SSA?