No, no, no. The Constitution assigns the responsibility for macroeconomic policy, an integral part of which is fiscal policy, to the national sphere of government. The national executive is therefore charged with the responsibility of ensuring the coherence of the tax system across all three spheres of government.
To this end, government has embarked on a significant tax-reform strategy, the goals of which are to develop a system that is sufficient, equitable, internationally competitive and, of course, simple to administer.
In 2003 this House passed the Provincial Tax Regulation Process Act, which sets out the framework for regulating provincial taxes. The Bill, which we are debating here today, sets out a similar framework with respect to local government.
It is with this constitutional framework as the basis, that we ask the House to support the Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Bill today. This piece of legislation will regulate the imposition of charges and fees by municipalities, as provided for by section 229(1)(b) of the Constitution. A municipality may impose other taxes, levies and duties appropriate to local government, or to the category of local government, into which such municipality falls if authorised by national legislation.
Viewed in this context, the Bill is an enabling piece of legislation. Without it, municipalities cannot legally impose any new taxes. This Bill presents our municipalities with the opportunity to introduce new taxes, but within a carefully managed national macroeconomic policy framework.
The Bill gives the Minister of Finance the authority to evaluate requests for the introduction of new municipal taxes by a municipality, by a group of municipalities, or by organised local government in order to ensure consistency with national economic policy or other constitutional requirements. If an application is approved, then the Minister of Finance will issue regulations that will prescribe the date from which in the framework in terms of which the municipal tax may be imposed.
The legislation will therefore put in place a proactive framework for the exercise of local fiscal powers and functions by ensuring that there is appropriate interaction between the spheres of government prior to the introduction of any new municipal taxes.
The Bill is intended to strike an appropriate balance between the right of municipalities to impose taxes, levies, duties and surcharges that will enable them to play a more meaningful and effective role in the development of their communities by delivering additional and better services to them on the one hand, and with the constitutional responsibility of national government to oversee sound policy of the country on the other.
The intention is to ensure that our municipalities are financially viable in order to guarantee that the communities they serve benefit, especially with regard to basic services. We do not want to allow a situation in which taxes are imposed without appropriate control mechanisms that ensure that these same communities suffer directly either by having to pay more taxes than they are able to afford; or, alternatively, by losing through loss of jobs and income when it becomes economically unsound for businesses to remain in a particular area due to high tax burdens imposed by municipalities.
The Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Bill also deals with surcharges in municipal taxes referred to in the Constitution. The surcharge in a municipal service is an additional charge levied by a municipality in addition to the fee or tariff charged for the provision of a service. The surcharge can therefore be viewed as an indirect tax as it is a payment in addition to the normal charge. Surpluses generated from trading services, such as electricity and water, are used by municipalities for the funding or subsidising of other essential municipal activities where limited or no charges are levied.
The legislation will prescribe, through regulations, compulsory national norms and standards for imposing surcharges, including maximum surcharges that may be imposed by municipalities on fees for services provided by them or on their behalf. The norms and standards for surcharges on specific municipal services will be developed in consultation with relevant industry stakeholders. As pointed out, we want to ensure that the taxes and surcharges do not impede the development of the local economy. This function of regulating this authority is best placed centrally with national government.
As national government, the interests of the members of our communities have always been given priority, and this proposed piece of legislation seeks to continue to protect our communities through the regulation of taxes and surcharges at the level where it affects their daily access to basic services.
Although proposals have been made that an independent regulator be appointed to undertake these functions - as I previously indicated in this House during our deliberations on the Division of Revenue Bill - as elected representatives we have a collective responsibility in ensuring proper co- ordination of macroeconomic policy objectives across all three spheres of government. The legislation will not set specific taxes which municipalities may impose, but provides the Minister of Finance, or a municipality, or a group of municipalities, or organised local government, if approved, with the kinds of taxes that they would like to introduce.
Lastly, I want to thank the Portfolio Committee on Finance, ably presided over by - there he is - the hon Nhlanhla Nene, for the hard work they put in to finalise the proposed legislation and the hon Lechesa Tsenoli. The other committee should also be thanked for their participation. We recognise the importance of the processes of consultation undertaken, and we thank you for the frank and in-depth discussion with regard to the provisions and implications of the Bill. Thank you very much, Deputy Speaker. [Applause.]