With regard to the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act (AARTO), Act 46 of 1998, on what policy basis and other considerations it has been decided that the AARTO testing phases in Johannesburg and Tshwane were successful;
(2) whether he has found that there is a reduction in the number of motor vehicle accidents; if not, (a) why does he find that AARTO has not made a difference and (b) why the implementation of AARTO nationwide will deliver a different outcome;
(3) whether the Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA) has the operational efficiency to effectively deal with the adjudication of offences; if not, why will the RTIA function more effectively in the adjudication of offences, especially as the volume of offences will increase drastically;
(4) whether he has found that the collection of fines was better than before AARTO was established; if not, why will the implementation of AARTO nationwide definitely ensure that the collection of fines will improve with regard to the previous system and the creation of AARTO courts across the country that currently do not exist;
(5) whether he has clear evidence that the implementation of AARTO nationwide will make the roads safer; if not, why are they continuing to implement the system; if so, whether he and his department accept personal responsibility if the roads become more unsafe and more people are killed or injured by reckless driving?