Rule 92(10) is very clear. When a point of order is raised during a debate, the member called to order must - not may, not should, not at the discretion of the presiding officer - resume his of her seat. After the point of order has been stated to the presiding officer by the member raising it, the member raising it must likewise immediately resume their seat.
With respect, Deputy Speaker, you did not implement Rule 92(10) of the Rules and I would again say to you that, if the Rules are to be applied, they must be applied consistently. It is very clear that there are some people who don't have to take their seat when a point of order is called.
I asked you whether it is parliamentary for the member standing here and who is still remaining standing despite me raising a point of order ... despite you not implementing the Rules of this House as required of you ... is it parliamentary to accuse a member of having an empty head?