Financial Year |
April |
May |
June |
July |
August |
September |
October |
November |
December |
January |
February |
March |
Total |
2012/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
% of the total of claims prescribed during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14% |
14% |
29% |
43% |
100% |
2013/14 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
10 |
2,066 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
664 |
121 |
2,894 |
% of the total of claims prescribed during the year |
0.2% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
0.1% |
0.3% |
0.3% |
71% |
0.3% |
0.1% |
0% |
23% |
4% |
100% |
2014/15 |
1 |
14 |
4 |
2 |
1,716 |
3,974 |
178 |
- |
- |
36 |
201 |
112 |
6,238 |
% of the total of claims prescribed during the year |
0.0% |
0.2% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
28% |
64% |
3% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
1% |
3% |
2% |
100% |
2015/16 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
7 |
6 |
38 |
39 |
7 |
32 |
14 |
3 |
168 |
% of total% of the total of claims prescribed during the year |
2% |
1% |
2% |
8% |
4% |
4% |
23% |
23% |
4% |
19% |
8% |
2% |
100% |
2016/17 |
7 |
60 |
21 |
16 |
77 |
5 |
18 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
225 |
% of the total of claims prescribed during the year |
3% |
27% |
9% |
7% |
34% |
2% |
8% |
2% |
3% |
1% |
0.4% |
3% |
100% |
2017/18 |
3 |
3 |
22 |
272 |
8 |
12 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
344 |
% of the total of claims prescribed during the year |
1% |
1% |
6% |
79% |
2% |
3% |
1% |
2% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
0% |
100% |
2018/19* |
3 |
3 |
44 |
53 |
10 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
% of the total of claims prescribed during the period |
2% |
2% |
27% |
33% |
6% |
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
2) the overall reasons, amongst others, for the prescription of the claims in each month, are claims that prescribed in the following circumstances: while awaiting the judgment in the case of Mvumvu and Others v The Minister of Transport and the RAF (Case CCT 67/10); awaiting the completion of medico-legal reports by medical experts; delays in obtaining confirmation of appointments for assessments for medico-legal reports; delays in obtaining completed medical reports from hospitals; awaiting necessary information from claimants or service providers; files not sent to Regions by consultants prior to prescription of the claim; administrative issues such as incorrect registration, miscommunication between the regions; where direct claimants have subsequently elected to instruct an attorney and summons is not issued before prescription and where claimants failed to provide correct contact information, or contact information subsequently changed and the claimant failed to inform the RAF;
3) The RAF has implemented a Direct Claims Policy with effect from 15 February 2016. The purpose of the Direct Claims Management Policy, amongst others, is to regulate the internal management of Direct Claims to ensure that the rights of Unrepresented Claimants are protected; to ensure that the risks to the RAF are managed; and finally, to manage conflicts of interest that may arise. The Direct Claims Policy provides for consequence management in the event of non-compliance.