a) The total number of officials who have faced disciplinary action were 18.
b) Details of disciplinary action in each are as follows:
Incident Description |
Official No 1 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and approval of appointment of service provider not done by the delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 2 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM |
Incident Description |
Official No 3 |
Decision to appoint the service provider not done by a delegated official. Supplier/service provider appointed without having an original Tax Clearance Certificate and BBEE Cetificate |
Incident Description |
Official No 4 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and no evidence of recommending and approval by the Accounting Officer |
|
Payments made to the supplier in excess of the approved contract amount and no approval of extension of contract by the Accounting Officer |
Incident Description |
Official No 5 |
Performing artists appointed not registered on CSD |
Incident Description |
Official No 6 |
Procurement of service not done through SCM and approval not done by the delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 7 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and approval of appointment of service provider not done by the delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 8 |
Supplier/service provider appointed without having an original Tax Clearance Certificate and BBEE Cetificate |
Incident Description |
Official No 9 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and approval of appointment of service provider not done by the delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 10 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and reasons provided to deviate are not justifiable |
Incident Description |
Official No 11 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and approval of appointment of service provider not done by the delegated official (DG). |
Incident Description |
Official No 12 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and approval of additional items not done by the delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 13 |
Method or procurement used is incosistent with those prescribed in terms of PN 8 of 2007/2008 paragraph 3.2 |
Incident Description |
Official No 14 |
Decision to appoint the service provider not done by a delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 15 |
No tax clearance certificate was submitted by the supplier during the procurement of services |
Incident Description |
Official No 16 |
Procurement of services not done through SCM and approval of repairs not done by delegated official |
Incident Description |
Official No 17 |
Award of procurement was made without an original Tax Clearance Certificate and no completion of SBD documents |
Incident Description |
Official No 18 |
Appointment of consultants without following a competitive bidding process |
|
Competitive bidding process were not followed in in the awards of bids |
|
Procurement of services not done through SCM and reasons provided to deviate were not justifiable |
|
Request for quotations did not stipulate the preference point system to be applied |
|
Appointment of service providers without valid tax clearance certificate |
|
Three quotations were not obtained and reasons provided were not justifiable |
|
BBEE points allocated on invaliud certificate resulting in incorrect award |
|
Expenditure not committed by a delegated official |
|
Evaluation criteria applied differs from original request for quotation |
|
Supplier with lowest quote not selected and no reasons provided and approved by the delegated official |
|
Performing artist appointed not registered on CSD |
|
Variation order in excess of 15% not approved by National Treasury |
|
Required number of quotes not obtained and reasons provided were not justifiable |
|
No evidence that the bid was received before the closing date and time |
|
EME affidavit used to allocate BBEEE points instead of certificate, resulting in incorrect allocation of points and award |