(1) Whether, with reference to her reply to question 2547 on 4 November 2013, she knows that (a) the said product and other similar products are banned in Europe, (b) adverse reactions have been reported in the United States of America (USA) and Canada and (c) the parent company (name furnished) in South Africa has withdrawn the product from the market in the USA and Canada as a result of these adverse reactions; (2) why has there not been a cautionary withdrawal of the license of the product while the adverse reactions reported in the USA are investigated; (3) whether she has found that the Government regards the welfare of animals as important as the USA government does; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, how was this conclusion reached?