. The allegations are of such a serious nature that it would be inappropriate for Mr Prinsloo to perform his functions while they are being investigated, and should they prove to be true, he would be liable to be removed from office. . Given public opinion on the abuse of women by men, Mr Prinsloo's continued service would damage the image of the judiciary, and may be considered to indicate insensitivity. . Judicial officers are expected to be exemplary to inspire confidence in the administration of justice. Although the allegations have still to be proved, their moral depravity is such that Mr Prinsloo should be suspended from office in the meantime. The matter has also received media attention. 5. On the 3 February 2010 the Minister provisionally suspended Mr Prinsloo. In terms of section 13(3)(c) of the Magistrates Act, 1993, Parliament must, as soon as is reasonably possible, pass a resolution as to whether or not the provisional suspension of a magistrate is confirmed.