The point of order that was raised is indeed valid and it is in order. Therefore, to the member who made the second statement: that statement is invalid and is ruled out. We are warning the hon member that in future he should not do so, because indeed it is within the Rules and we need to respect the Rules. So the second statement is therefore ruled out.
That concludes the members' statements. There were quite a number of Ministers in the House earlier. I see two Deputy Ministers over there. Are there any Ministerial responses?