(1) Whether, with reference to his reply to question 226 on 15 March 2024, and in particular, subsection (1), he has established the reasons that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) failed to prosecute the cases referred for prosecution by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC); if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
(2) whether he requested the President of the Republic, Mr M C Ramaphosa, to establish a commission of inquiry, as recommended by the Ntsebeza report, which refers to the establishment of an independent commission of inquiry under either section 84(2)(f) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, or the Commissions Act, Act 8 of 1947, to investigate the extent of, and rationale behind, the political interference with the NPA during the period 2003 until 2017; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
(3) whether the alleged political interference with the NPA, referred to in the Rodrigues judgment and the Ntsebeza report, has been referred to the SA Police Service (SAPS) and/or the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) for investigation, in order for a determination to be made under section 41(1) of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Act, Act 32 of 1998; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;
(4) whether, if the alleged political interference in the decision to prosecute TRC cases had not been referred to the SAPS and/or DPCI for investigation, the NPA has been able to determine if there has been a violation of sections 32(1)(b) read together with 41(1) of the NPA Act; if not, why not; if so, (a) has there been a decision to prosecute and (b) what are the relevant details? NW991E